GuidesDevelopment and AI
AI‑assisted development: what it changes for your project
What has changed
A coding agent reads a whole project, writes functions, runs the tests and fixes its own mistakes. Tasks that took a day take an hour. The developer’s job shifts: less typing, more deciding and verifying.
What goes faster
- Repetitive codeForms, admin screens, API calls.
- TestsWhich were written too rarely for lack of time.
- MigrationsMoving to a new framework version, renaming everywhere.
- Understanding existing codeYou are taking over.
- DocumentationAnd interface translations.
- PrototypesTo compare two ideas before choosing.
What does not go faster
- Understanding the need and deciding the scope.
- Choosing the architecture and the data schema.
- Waiting for feedback from the client and users.
- Store review, payment providers’ lead times.
- Finding a bug that only occurs in production.
On a complete project, code was never the largest share of the time.
The risks of generated code
| Risk | What happens | The answer |
|---|---|---|
| Security | Forgotten access rights, secrets in the code | Targeted review, automated analysis |
| Inconsistency | Three ways of doing the same thing | Written conventions, fixed architecture |
| Dependencies | Useless or invented libraries | Checking every addition |
| Fake tests | Tests that pass without checking anything | Reviewing the tests themselves |
| Debt | A lot of code nobody has read | Small deliveries, reviewed one by one |
The method that holds
- 1A human decides the architectureBefore the first line.
- 2Written project instructionsConventions, commands, what must not be touched.
- 3Small tasksOne at a time, each verifiable.
- 4Tests firstSo the agent has a target.
- 5A review of every changeAs for a colleague’s work.
- 6Continuous integrationThat rejects what breaks.
That is how we work.
What the client gains
- More frequent deliveriesHence earlier feedback.
- More finishFor the same budget: tests, accessibility, translations.
- PrototypesTo settle a question instead of debating it.
Pocabase serves 46 languages from a single codebase. Votons covers a website, an API and two mobile apps. Scopes of that size remain within reach of a small team.
The guarantees to ask for
- Who reviews the code produced?
- Are there automated tests, and what do they cover?
- Is the code in my repository, readable by another developer?
- Are my data and my code used to train a model?
- What happens if the tool used changes or disappears?
For a founder
Generation tools let you build a convincing prototype on your own. It is an excellent way to sharpen an idea. Before putting real users and real data into it, have it reviewed. See Building an MVP with AI.
Frequently asked questions
- Does a project cost less thanks to AI?
- The making goes faster, especially on repetitive code. Scoping, decisions, acceptance and going to production take the same time. The gain often shows as a wider scope or a better finish for the same budget.
- Is AI-generated code reliable?
- It is when it is reviewed, tested and written within an architecture decided by an experienced developer. Delivered as is, it contains flaws and inconsistencies that cost a lot later.
- What is vibe coding?
- Building an application by describing what you want to an AI, without reading the code produced. It is effective for a prototype, risky for a product handling real data.

